Home / Library / Workers Compensation

Massachusetts Legal Answer · Workers Compensation

Can You Quit Your Job While on Workers' Comp in Massachusetts?

Last updated

Yes, you can quit your job while on workers’ comp in Massachusetts, and the resignation by itself does not end your weekly benefits, because the statute pays them while your incapacity for work lasts, not while your employment lasts. What quitting can change is the number the insurer uses for your earning capacity, meaning the weekly wage the law says you can still earn after the injury. Under M.G.L. c. 152, sec. 35D, if your employer has made your old job or a suitable lighter job available and your doctor says you can do it, the insurer can treat you as capable of earning that job’s wage whether you take it or walk away from it. Quitting also has consequences outside workers’ comp, most of all for unemployment benefits.

This page explains which parts of a claim survive a resignation, which parts a resignation puts at risk, and the order to do things in if you are thinking about leaving. It is general information about the Massachusetts statutes, not advice about a particular claim.

Why Quitting Does Not Switch Off Weekly Benefits

The two main weekly benefits in chapter 152 are written around incapacity, not around a job.

Section 34 pays total incapacity benefits “while the incapacity for work resulting from the injury is total”: sixty percent of your average weekly wage before the injury, up to the maximum weekly compensation rate, for no more than 156 weeks. Your average weekly wage is, in general, your earnings in the twelve months before the injury divided by fifty-two. Section 35 pays partial incapacity benefits “while the incapacity for work resulting from the injury is partial”: sixty percent of the difference between that average weekly wage and “the weekly wage he or she is capable of earning after the injury,” capped at seventy-five percent of the sec. 34 amount, for up to 260 weeks.

Neither section says anything about staying on the payroll. The benefit is compensation for lost earning power caused by the injury, so a person who is totally unable to work is owed sec. 34 benefits whether the employer still lists them as an employee, has let them go, or has received their resignation letter.

The same is true of medical care. Section 30 says “the insurer shall furnish to an injured employee adequate and reasonable health care services, and medicines if needed,” with no condition about current employment. Quitting does not end the insurer’s duty to pay for reasonable treatment of the work injury.

Section 8(2) confirms the point from the other direction. It lists the only situations in which an insurer “paying weekly compensation benefits shall not modify or discontinue such payments except.” The list runs from (a) to (l): an order or decision, a signed assent on the department’s form, a return to work, a doctor’s report plus an available job, a change in the first 180 days, a vocational rehabilitation suspension, exhausted benefits, a missed earnings report, a sec. 45 suspension, incarceration, a sec. 36B reduction, and death. A resignation is not on it.

Where the Trap Is: A Job You Walk Away From Can Still Count

Here is the part the first answer leaves out. Section 35D defines the weekly wage you are “capable of earning” as “the greatest of” four measures:

  1. “The actual earnings of the employee during each week.”
  2. “The earnings that the employee is capable of earning in the job the employee held at the time of injury, provided, however, that such job has been made available to the employee and he is capable of performing it.”
  3. “The earnings the employee is capable of earning in a particular suitable job; provided, however, that such job has been made available to the employee and he is capable of performing it.”
  4. “The earnings that the employee is capable of earning.”

Measures (2) and (3) turn on two words: “made available.” They do not say the job must be accepted, kept, or still held. If the employer offered your former job, or a suitable modified job, and your treating doctor wrote that you could do it, then the statute measures your earning capacity by what that job pays, and walking away from it does not make that earning capacity disappear. The statute gives that paperwork weight: “the employee’s receipt of a written offer of his former job from the employer, together with a written report from the treating physician that the employee is capable of performing such job shall be prima facie evidence of an earnings capability.” Prima facie evidence means proof that stands unless it is rebutted.

A “suitable job” is defined in the same section as “any job that the employee is physically and mentally capable of performing, including light work, considering the nature and severity of the employee’s injury, so long as such job bears a reasonable relationship to the employee’s work experience, education, or training.” So a light-duty position in the same line of work can qualify; a job with no connection to your background generally cannot.

Section 8(2)(d) then lets the insurer act on that earning capacity without waiting for a judge. It may modify payments when it has “a medical report from the treating physician,” or an impartial examiner’s report, saying you can return to “the job held at the time of injury, or other suitable job pursuant to section thirty-five D,” together with “a written report from the person employing said employee at the time of the injury indicating that such a suitable job is open and has been made available, and remains open to the employee.” The paragraph adds that “if due, compensation shall be paid under section thirty-five.” In plain terms, the insurer can move you from total to partial benefits on those two documents, and the partial rate is figured from what the available job pays.

That is the practical risk of quitting a light-duty or modified job you had returned to, or of resigning in response to a written job offer. The resignation does not end benefits, but it can leave the insurer holding exactly the two reports sec. 8(2)(d) asks for.

Answer Capsule

You can resign from your job while receiving workers’ compensation in Massachusetts, and resigning does not by itself end weekly benefits or medical coverage, because M.G.L. c. 152, secs. 34 and 35 pay while the incapacity for work lasts and sec. 30 requires the insurer to furnish reasonable health care without reference to employment. A resignation is not one of the grounds in sec. 8(2) on which an insurer may stop payments without an order. The risk is earning capacity. Under sec. 35D(2) and (3), a former job or suitable job that “has been made available” and that your treating physician says you can perform sets the wage you are treated as capable of earning, and under sec. 8(2)(d) the insurer may move you to partial benefits under sec. 35 on the doctor’s report and the employer’s written report that the job remains open. Unemployment is a poor fallback: M.G.L. c. 151A, sec. 25(d) bars unemployment benefits for any period in which total disability workers’ compensation is being received, and sec. 25(e) disqualifies a voluntary quit unless the claimant shows good cause attributable to the employer or urgent, compelling and necessitous reasons.

Quitting Compared With Being Fired

The two endings look alike from the outside and are treated differently by the statute.

You resignYour employer ends your employment
Weekly benefits under secs. 34 and 35Continue while incapacity lastsContinue while incapacity lasts
Medical care under sec. 30ContinuesContinues
Available-job rule in sec. 35D(2) and (3)A job made available and walked away from can still set earning capacityA job the employer has withdrawn is generally no longer “made available”
One-year presumption in sec. 8(2)Written for a termination, not a resignationTermination within one year of returning is presumed to be because of incapacity or an unsuitable job, unless the insurer proves otherwise
Retaliation claim under sec. 75B(2)Written around a discharge or other discrimination by the employerAvailable if the discharge was because you exercised a right under chapter 152
Unemployment under c. 151A, sec. 25(e)Disqualified unless good cause attributable to the employer or urgent, compelling and necessitous reasonsDisqualified only for deliberate misconduct, a knowing rule violation, or a criminal conviction

The one-year presumption deserves its own sentence, because it is a protection people give up without knowing it exists. Section 8(2) provides that “any termination of an employee within one year of resumption of work with his prior employer will be presumed to be for the reason that the employee was physically or mentally incapable of performing the duties required by the job or that the job was unsuitable for the employee, unless the insurer demonstrates the contrary by a preponderance of evidence.” The word is termination. A worker who goes back on light duty and is let go in month five has that presumption on their side; a worker who resigns in month five is outside its wording.

The retaliation rule works the same way. Section 75B(2) says no employer “shall discharge, refuse to hire or in any other manner discriminate against an employee because the employee has exercised a right afforded by this chapter,” and makes a violating employer liable for lost wages, suitable employment and attorney fees. The article on being fired while on comp covers that remedy in full. If you are resigning because of how the employer has treated you since the claim, that belongs in writing before the resignation, not after.

Returning Later: The Hiring Preference

Section 75A gives “any person who has lost a job as a result of an injury compensable under this chapter” a preference in rehiring by the employer they worked for at the time of the injury, “over any persons not at the time of application for reemployment employed by such employer; provided, however, that a suitable job is available.” An employer that violates it is liable for lost wages, a suitable job, and attorney fees. The statute’s words are “lost a job as a result of an injury.” A resignation for an unrelated reason fits that wording less naturally than a job lost to the injury itself, which is one more reason to state the reason in the resignation letter if the injury is the reason.

Quitting and Unemployment Benefits

Many people plan to quit and collect unemployment in the gap. Chapter 151A makes that harder than it sounds in three separate ways.

Total disability comp and unemployment do not overlap. Section 25(d) disqualifies a claimant for “any period with respect to which he is receiving or has received or is about to receive compensation for total disability under the workers’ compensation law,” with an exception only for specific-injury payments under sec. 36 of chapter 152. While sec. 34 benefits are being paid, unemployment is not.

A voluntary quit disqualifies unless you prove a reason the statute accepts. Section 25(e)(1) bars benefits after a person “left work (1) voluntarily unless the employee establishes by substantial and credible evidence that he had good cause for leaving attributable to the employing unit or its agent.” The same paragraph separately protects a claimant whose “reasons for leaving were for such an urgent, compelling and necessitous nature as to make his separation involuntary.” The disqualification lasts until the person has had “at least eight weeks of work” and earned at least eight times the weekly benefit amount.

You must be able to work. Section 24(b) requires a claimant to “be capable of, available, and actively seeking work.” That is the opposite of what a total incapacity claim asserts, so the two positions are hard to hold at the same time.

The upshot is that quitting to live on unemployment rarely works while a comp claim is active, and a partially incapacitated worker who quits a suitable job may find the Department of Unemployment Assistance and the workers’ comp insurer both pointing to the same available job.

Resignations Inside a Lump Sum Settlement

Some workers first hear the word resignation at the end of a claim, when a lump sum settlement is on the table. Section 48 allows the insurer and employee to “redeem any liability for compensation, in whole or in part, by the payment by the insurer of a lump sum amount,” and it requires approval by a conciliator or judge before the agreement is perfected. Nothing in sec. 48 makes a resignation a condition of a lump sum. When one is asked for, it is a term the parties negotiate, and it should be weighed with the same questions this page raises: the hiring preference under sec. 75A, any claim under sec. 75B, and unemployment.

Section 48(2) also matters here. When the insurer has accepted liability or a decision has found it liable, a lump sum “shall not redeem liability for the payment of medical benefits or vocational rehabilitation benefits with respect to such injury.” Leaving the job as part of a settlement does not, by itself, end medical coverage for the work injury in that situation.

If You Went Back to Work and It Is Not Working

A different situation is the worker who returned to the job and finds within days that the injury makes it impossible. That case has its own rule, sec. 8(2)(c), with a twenty-eight day window and a twenty-one day certified-letter deadline, and it is explained step by step in the article on working while on comp. Leaving under that rule is not the same as quitting for other reasons, and the letter is what makes the difference on paper.

If You Are Thinking About Quitting, in Order

  1. Get your restrictions in writing from your treating doctor. Under sec. 35D the doctor’s written report is prima facie evidence of what you can do, so it is the document that decides whether an offered job counts.
  2. Read any job offer against those restrictions. A job outside the restrictions is not one you are “capable of performing,” and a job with no connection to your training may not be “suitable” under sec. 35D.
  3. Answer written job offers in writing. If you decline or leave an offered job, say why, in terms of the injury and the restrictions.
  4. Put the real reason in the resignation letter. If the injury is the reason, say so; the wording of sec. 75A and the unemployment rules in c. 151A, sec. 25(e) both turn on why you left.
  5. Do not count on unemployment while sec. 34 benefits are paid. Section 25(d) of chapter 151A bars it for that period.
  6. Keep reporting earnings from any new job. Section 11D still applies after you resign, as the working-while-on-comp article explains.
  7. Keep your medical treatment going. Section 30 coverage continues, and gaps in treatment are what insurers point to when they argue capacity has improved.

Key terms

  • Average weekly wage: your earnings in the twelve calendar months before the injury divided by fifty-two, under M.G.L. c. 152, sec. 1, the base both total and partial benefits are figured from.
  • Earning capacity: the weekly wage you are treated as capable of earning after the injury, set by sec. 35D as the greatest of actual earnings, an available former job, an available suitable job, or what you are capable of earning.
  • Made available: the condition in sec. 35D(2) and (3) that the employer has actually offered the job; it does not require that you accept or keep it.
  • Suitable job: any job you are physically and mentally capable of performing, including light work, that bears a reasonable relationship to your experience, education or training.
  • Prima facie evidence: proof that is enough to establish a fact unless the other side rebuts it, which is the weight sec. 35D gives a written job offer plus a doctor’s report.
  • Voluntary quit: leaving work by your own choice, which disqualifies a claimant from unemployment under c. 151A, sec. 25(e) unless good cause attributable to the employer or urgent, compelling and necessitous reasons are shown.

The Short Version

Quitting does not end workers’ comp in Massachusetts, and it does not end medical coverage. It can lower your weekly check if the employer has put an available job on the table and your doctor has cleared you for it, it steps outside two protections written for workers who are let go, and it usually closes off unemployment. For the length of each benefit, see how long workers’ comp lasts; for how comp sits alongside Social Security, see the comparison article. The practice overview is on the workers’ compensation page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Will my workers’ comp stop if I quit my job in Massachusetts?

A: Not because of the resignation alone. M.G.L. c. 152, secs. 34 and 35 pay weekly benefits while the incapacity for work lasts, and a resignation is not one of the grounds in sec. 8(2) on which an insurer may stop or reduce payments without an order.

Q: Can the insurer cut my benefits if I quit a light-duty job?

A: It can try, and the statute gives it a route. Under sec. 35D(3), a suitable job that “has been made available” and that you are capable of performing sets your earning capacity, and sec. 8(2)(d) lets the insurer move to partial benefits under sec. 35 on your treating doctor’s report and the employer’s written report that the job remains open.

Q: Do I keep my medical coverage if I resign?

A: Yes. Section 30 requires the insurer to furnish adequate and reasonable health care services for the work injury, with no condition about staying employed.

Q: Can I collect unemployment if I quit while on workers’ comp?

A: Usually not while total disability benefits are being paid, because M.G.L. c. 151A, sec. 25(d) bars unemployment for that period. After that, a voluntary quit disqualifies you under sec. 25(e) unless you show good cause attributable to the employer or urgent, compelling and necessitous reasons, and sec. 24(b) requires you to be capable of and available for work.

Q: Is it better to be fired than to quit while on workers’ comp?

A: They are treated differently, not better or worse in every case. A termination within one year of returning to work is presumed under sec. 8(2) to be because of incapacity or an unsuitable job, and sec. 75B(2) covers a discharge for exercising workers’ comp rights; neither provision is written around a resignation.

Q: Does my employer have to rehire me later if I quit?

A: Section 75A gives a hiring preference to a person “who has lost a job as a result of an injury compensable under this chapter,” when a suitable job is available. Whether a resignation fits that wording depends on why you left, which is why the reason should be in writing.

Q: Do I have to resign to get a lump sum settlement?

A: Section 48 does not require it. A resignation, when requested, is a negotiated term of the settlement, and where liability has been accepted, sec. 48(2) keeps medical and vocational rehabilitation benefits for the injury outside the lump sum.

Q: Is Jimmy Knows AI giving me legal advice?

A: No. This is general information about the Massachusetts workers’ compensation and unemployment statutes, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Whether quitting makes sense depends on your restrictions, any job offer, your benefit type and the state of your claim, so a specific situation should be reviewed with a lawyer.

Talking to a Lawyer

The decision to resign usually comes with a job offer, a supervisor’s pressure, or a settlement draft, and each of those arrives with paperwork that the insurer will read closely later. Looking at the offer, the doctor’s restrictions and the resignation letter before anything is signed is easier than rebuilding a benefit rate afterward.

Jim Glaser Law can be reached at (617) JIM-WINS. The line is answered 24 hours a day. The first telephone consultation is offered without charge. Cases accepted on a contingency basis carry no attorney fee unless there is a recovery, and case costs and expenses are addressed in the written fee agreement signed at intake.

This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Massachusetts law is fact-specific; telephone Jim Glaser Law about your particular situation. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Attorney advertising under Mass. R. Prof. C. 7.1 to 7.5. Responsible attorney: Jim Glaser, admitted in MA only, of counsel to Keches Law. Principal office: 77 Pond St., Sharon, MA. Most cases referred to other jurisdictionally licensed lawyers for principal liability.

Jim Glaser Law

Request a call back

Leave a phone number or email. The firm reaches out within one business day. Nothing here creates an attorney-client relationship.

Or call now (617) JIM-WINS
Call (617) JIM-WINS Get help