Home / How It Works

Methodology

How an answer is composed

The editorial method behind every entry, sub-entry, and AI response on this site. Transparency about substance, attribution, and the limits of what the AI can answer.

The editorial method

Each entry begins with a question Massachusetts residents actually ask: "Who pays my medical bills after I am rear-ended?" "Can the store really say a snowstorm protects them from a slip-and-fall claim?" "What happens when my landlord keeps my deposit?" Static entries are drafted against the controlling Massachusetts authority, leading case law, and the firm's practice experience.

The role of the AI extension

The AI extension, branded with the red exclamation mark in the wordmark (Jimmy Knows A!), responds to reader questions submitted through the home-page search or the dedicated inquiry form. It composes answers in real time, drawing on the canonical Massachusetts authorities the publishing firm has indexed (M.G.L. citations, leading case law, county courts and addresses) and the practice-area scope the firm has set. It is locked to Massachusetts law. It is forbidden from inventing citations.

The publishing firm does not review individual AI responses before they reach the reader. That limitation is intentional and disclosed: a real-time reference work serves Massachusetts residents at a volume no single attorney could approve answer by answer. What the firm does instead is set the editorial framework once, hard, and let the AI operate within it: the citations are real, the scope is locked, the disclaimers run on every response, and the call CTA is the next step on anything case-specific.

When a reader names a Massachusetts city or county, the site provides the AI with the authoritative courthouse address from the firm's reference data. The AI may not substitute its own. This is how the site avoids the kind of plausible-sounding-but-wrong address an ungrounded model produces.

What happens when a reader telephones the firm

Every call to (617) JIM-WINS is answered 24 hours a day, 7 days a week by the firm's voice intake, which captures the caller's name, matter type, and contact details, and routes a case summary to the firm. An attorney at Jim Glaser Law follows up directly. The first telephone consultation with the firm is offered without charge. Calls received outside business hours are intake-captured immediately; attorney follow-up occurs at the firm's earliest availability rather than in the middle of the night. Active-emergency calls (an arrest in progress, domestic violence, or any safety issue) should be made to 911 first, then to the firm.

The escalation toward real counsel

Reader questions are welcomed and answered. As a follow-up sequence deepens and the questions become more case-specific, the AI recognizes that the right answer no longer lives in a written reference work. By the third follow-up the AI's response is dominated by a next-step CTA: this is what the firm's free initial telephone consultation exists for. A callback request form appears for readers who would prefer the firm telephone them. The reader is never refused. They are routed.

The self-producing site

Real reader questions submitted to the site are reviewed and, with personally identifying details removed, may become future entries. New entries are drafted from clusters of semantically equivalent questions and queued for attorney review at the firm before publication. This is how the site grows: not from a content calendar, but from what Massachusetts residents are actually asking on a given week.

Limits

This site provides information, not legal advice. Reading an entry or speaking with the AI extension does not create an attorney-client relationship. The substance of any specific matter turns on facts that cannot be evaluated from a written question alone. For matters of consequence, telephone the firm.

This page constitutes legal information, not legal advice. Attorney advertising under Mass. R. Prof. C. 7.1 to 7.5. Responsible attorney: Jim Glaser, Massachusetts.